Asia’s Dominance in the Semiconductor Industry

THIS MATERIAL IS A MARKETING COMMUNICATION.

Asia’s Dominance in the Semiconductor Industry

Overview
Asia has a strong presence in the semiconductor industry globally. The region is already the biggest market for semiconductors, accounting for 60% of global semiconductor sales. (Deloitte 2020) South Korea, Taiwan, Japan, and China are key players in Asia.

South Korea – Memory powerhouse
South Korea has built up a dominant market share in memory, leading the effort to migrate memory technology and cutting cost per bit. In 2020, Samsung and SK Hynix combined accounted for 74% of DRAM (Dynamic random-access memory) market by bit shipments, and 59% market share in NAND (UBS 2021) There is also a sizable foundry business and domestic industry supply chain to support the local ecosystem.

Taiwan – well rounded, deep technology supply chain
Taiwan has developed a closely connected manufacturing supply chain from semiconductor to hardware, which creates synergy in the region. Taiwan is competitive in chip manufacturing, IC design, outsourced semiconductor assembly and test (OSAT), raw wafer, and more. TSMC has the largest market share in the foundry business and continues to be the technology leader in node migration. MediaTek is one of the two major suppliers in smartphone SoC (system on chip). GlobalWafers, after the acquisition of Siltronic, will have a 25% market share in the raw wafer market, 2nd largest globally behind SUMCO in Japan. (MS 2020)

China – Localization
Although its global market share remains relatively low at the moment, China is catching up in the semiconductor industry with strong government support. China has already invested RMB 650bn since 2014 through its state-owned sector investment fund, the National IC Industry Investment Fund (“The Big Fund”). We see a continuous flow of funding and talents to support foundries, fabless and other semiconductor companies in China.
Japan – Upstream specialist
Japan’s strengths in semiconductors are in raw materials, equipment, and small active-passive components. In upstream semiconductor materials, companies like Shin-Etsu and HOYA are global leaders. Tokyo Electron is one of the top three semiconductor equipment makers globally. Sony remains a leader in image sensor technology.

History
1970-2000: Rise and fall of Japan
From 1976 to 1979, under the guidance of the government, Japan began to implement the VLSI (very large-scale integrated circuit) research project. The project was led by the five largest semiconductor companies in Japan, Hitachi, Mitsubishi, Fujitsu, Toshiba, and NEC, with a total investment of 72 billion yen to make breakthroughs in the core generic technology of the semiconductor industry. The result was its leadership in DRAM technology with the launch of 64Kb, 256Kb, and 1Mb DRAM products in the 1980s. Japan had over 80% of DRAM market share in 1987 (Global Times 2019), and it also surpassed the US in global semiconductor market share for the first time in 1987 (48% Japan v 39% US) (Handotai Sangyo Kenkyusho, 2000)

We think a few factors contribute to the decline of Japan’s semiconductor industry in the 90s: 1) The ongoing US-Japan trade war and the US-Japanese Semiconductor Agreement in 1986 brought unfavorable policy, tax rate, and currency impact to Japanese DRAM makers. 2) Semiconductor companies in Japan did not have a diversified product portfolio, with a high concentration in DRAM. As downstream demand in PC took off, other semiconductor products like CPU (central processing unit) and GPU(Graphics processing unit), became more important. 3) Memory producers continue to close the cost gap with Japanese makers.

1990-2020: South Korea and Taiwan leading Asia semiconductor
Korean companies invested heavily in R&D to catch up with Japan in memory technology. Samsung, for example, had an average capital expenditure over revenue ratio at around 40% between 1987-92, compared to the industry average of 21%. (Monolithic 2011) The technology gap between Korean companies and Japanese companies narrowed from four years in 1983 to zero in 1992 with the launch of 64M DRAM.

Before TSMC was founded in 1987, most integrated circuit companies operated an IDM (Integrated circuit manufacturer) model with in-house design and manufacturing. TSMC and other foundries have developed this new business model of separating chip design and manufacturing. Taiwan companies have been able to leverage the relatively lower labor cost in the region to ramp up semiconductor manufacturing. Over time, IDM has been losing market share to foundries and fabless companies. One key reason is that process node migration requires significant capital investment and a high utilization rate to be profitable, which makes it increasingly difficult for IDM companies.

AUTHORED BY
Edward Chan
Investment Analyst – Hardware, Semi-conductor

Date: July 22, 2021
Category: Insights, Semiconductor

Asia’s Dominance in the Semiconductor Industry

Overview
Asia has a strong presence in the semiconductor industry globally. The region is already the biggest market for semiconductors, accounting for 60% of global semiconductor sales. (Deloitte 2020) South Korea, Taiwan, Japan, and China are key players in Asia.

South Korea – Memory powerhouse
South Korea has built up a dominant market share in memory, leading the effort to migrate memory technology and cutting cost per bit. In 2020, Samsung and SK Hynix combined accounted for 74% of DRAM (Dynamic random-access memory) market by bit shipments, and 59% market share in NAND (UBS 2021) There is also a sizable foundry business and domestic industry supply chain to support the local ecosystem.

Taiwan – well rounded, deep technology supply chain
Taiwan has developed a closely connected manufacturing supply chain from semiconductor to hardware, which creates synergy in the region. Taiwan is competitive in chip manufacturing, IC design, outsourced semiconductor assembly and test (OSAT), raw wafer, and more. TSMC has the largest market share in the foundry business and continues to be the technology leader in node migration. MediaTek is one of the two major suppliers in smartphone SoC (system on chip). GlobalWafers, after the acquisition of Siltronic, will have a 25% market share in the raw wafer market, 2nd largest globally behind SUMCO in Japan. (MS 2020)

China – Localization
Although its global market share remains relatively low at the moment, China is catching up in the semiconductor industry with strong government support. China has already invested RMB 650bn since 2014 through its state-owned sector investment fund, the National IC Industry Investment Fund (“The Big Fund”). We see a continuous flow of funding and talents to support foundries, fabless and other semiconductor companies in China.
Japan – Upstream specialist
Japan’s strengths in semiconductors are in raw materials, equipment, and small active-passive components. In upstream semiconductor materials, companies like Shin-Etsu and HOYA are global leaders. Tokyo Electron is one of the top three semiconductor equipment makers globally. Sony remains a leader in image sensor technology.

History
1970-2000: Rise and fall of Japan
From 1976 to 1979, under the guidance of the government, Japan began to implement the VLSI (very large-scale integrated circuit) research project. The project was led by the five largest semiconductor companies in Japan, Hitachi, Mitsubishi, Fujitsu, Toshiba, and NEC, with a total investment of 72 billion yen to make breakthroughs in the core generic technology of the semiconductor industry. The result was its leadership in DRAM technology with the launch of 64Kb, 256Kb, and 1Mb DRAM products in the 1980s. Japan had over 80% of DRAM market share in 1987 (Global Times 2019), and it also surpassed the US in global semiconductor market share for the first time in 1987 (48% Japan v 39% US) (Handotai Sangyo Kenkyusho, 2000)

We think a few factors contribute to the decline of Japan’s semiconductor industry in the 90s: 1) The ongoing US-Japan trade war and the US-Japanese Semiconductor Agreement in 1986 brought unfavorable policy, tax rate, and currency impact to Japanese DRAM makers. 2) Semiconductor companies in Japan did not have a diversified product portfolio, with a high concentration in DRAM. As downstream demand in PC took off, other semiconductor products like CPU (central processing unit) and GPU(Graphics processing unit), became more important. 3) Memory producers continue to close the cost gap with Japanese makers.

1990-2020: South Korea and Taiwan leading Asia semiconductor
Korean companies invested heavily in R&D to catch up with Japan in memory technology. Samsung, for example, had an average capital expenditure over revenue ratio at around 40% between 1987-92, compared to the industry average of 21%. (Monolithic 2011) The technology gap between Korean companies and Japanese companies narrowed from four years in 1983 to zero in 1992 with the launch of 64M DRAM.

Before TSMC was founded in 1987, most integrated circuit companies operated an IDM (Integrated circuit manufacturer) model with in-house design and manufacturing. TSMC and other foundries have developed this new business model of separating chip design and manufacturing. Taiwan companies have been able to leverage the relatively lower labor cost in the region to ramp up semiconductor manufacturing. Over time, IDM has been losing market share to foundries and fabless companies. One key reason is that process node migration requires significant capital investment and a high utilization rate to be profitable, which makes it increasingly difficult for IDM companies.

AUTHORED BY
Edward Chan
Investment Analyst – Hardware, Semi-conductor

Date: July 22, 2021
Category: Insights, Semiconductor

Disclaimer & Information for Investors

No distribution, solicitation or advice: This document is provided for information and illustrative purposes and is intended for your use only.  It is not a solicitation, offer or recommendation to buy or sell any security or other financial instrument. The information contained in this document has been provided as a general market commentary only and does not constitute any form of regulated financial advice, legal, tax or other regulated service.

The views and information discussed or referred in this document are as of the date of publication. Certain of the statements contained in this document are statements of future expectations and other forward-looking statements.  Views, opinions and estimates may change without notice and are based on a number of assumptions which may or may not eventuate or prove to be accurate. Actual results, performance or events may differ materially from those in such statements. In addition, the opinions expressed may differ from those of other Mirae Asset Global Investments’ investment professionals.

Investment involves risk: Past performance is not indicative of future performance. It cannot be guaranteed that the performance of the Fund will generate a return and there may be circumstances where no return is generated or the amount invested is lost. It may not be suitable for persons unfamiliar with the underlying securities or who are unwilling or unable to bear the risk of loss and ownership of such investment. Before making any investment decision, investors should read the Prospectus for details and the risk factors. Investors should ensure they fully understand the risks associated with the Fund and should also consider their own investment objective and risk tolerance level. Investors are advised to seek independent professional advice before making any investment.

Sources: Information and opinions presented in this document have been obtained or derived from sources which in the opinion of Mirae Asset Global Investments (“MAGI”) are reliable, but we make no representation as to their accuracy or completeness. We accept no liability for a loss arising from the use of this document.

Products, services and information may not be available in your jurisdiction and may be offered by affiliates, subsidiaries and/or distributors of MAGI as stipulated by local laws and regulations. Please consult with your professional adviser for further information on the availability of products and services within your jurisdiction. This document is issued by Mirae Asset Global Investments (HK) Limited and has not been reviewed by the Securities and Futures Commission.

Information for EU investors pursuant to Regulation (EU) 2019/1156: This document is a marketing communication and is intended for Professional Investors only. A Prospectus is available for the Mirae Asset Global Discovery Fund (the “Company”) a société d'investissement à capital variable (SICAV) domiciled in Luxembourg structured as an umbrella with a number of sub-funds. Key Investor Information Documents (“KIIDs”) are available for each share class of each of the sub-funds of the Company.

The Company’s Prospectus and the KIIDs can be obtained from www.am.miraeasset.eu/fund-literature . The Prospectus is available in English, French, German, and Danish, while the KIIDs are available in one of the official languages of each of the EU Member States into which each sub-fund has been notified for marketing under the Directive 2009/65/EC (the “UCITS Directive”). Please refer to the Prospectus and the KIID before making any final investment decisions.

A summary of investor rights is available in English from www.am.miraeasset.eu/investor-rights-summary.

The sub-funds of the Company are currently notified for marketing into a number of EU Member States under the UCITS Directive. FundRock Management Company can terminate such notifications for any share class and/or sub-fund of the Company at any time using the process contained in Article 93a of the UCITS Directive.

Australia: The information contained in this document is provided by Mirae Asset Global Investments (HK) Limited (“MAGIHK”), which is exempted from the requirement to hold an Australian financial services license under the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) (Corporations Act) pursuant to ASIC Class Order 03/1103 (Class Order) in respect of the financial services it provides to wholesale clients (as defined in the Corporations Act) in Australia. MAGIHK is regulated by the Securities and Futures Commission of Hong Kong under Hong Kong laws, which differ from Australian laws. Pursuant to the Class Order, this document and any information regarding MAGIHK and its products is strictly provided to and intended for Australian wholesale clients only. The contents of this document is prepared by Mirae Asset Global Investments (HK) Limited and has not been reviewed by the Australian Investments & Securities Commission.

Copyright 2021. All rights reserved. No part of this document may be reproduced in any form, or referred to in any other publication, without express written permission of Mirae Asset Global Investments (Hong Kong) Limited.